When should you avoid using interpart expression links and geometry links?

Avoiding interpart expression links and geometry links is beneficial in scenarios where your company prefers to maintain a controlled environment for released parts. This preference usually stems from the fact that links can create dependencies among parts that may complicate modifications, lead to errors if references are broken, and hinder the overall stability of the assembly.

When a company releases a part for production or further use, ensuring that it remains stable and unaffected by modifications in other parts can be crucial for maintaining design integrity. By steering clear of these links in released parts, you mitigate the risk of unintended alterations affecting other components, thus ensuring that the released designs are robust and reliable for future use or for manufacturing processes.

The other options do not highlight the primary reason for avoiding these links in a corporate context. At the beginning of the design phase, for example, there might be a need for flexibility that could benefit from using links. Editing your design frequently doesn't inherently warrant avoiding links, as managing them can enhance design changes if handled properly. Lastly, the idea of always using interpart expressions contradicts the premise of strategic decision-making in maintaining parts.